Update: here is the list I compiled from all the suggestions: A List of Must Read PopSci Books. Thanks everyone!
This is a blog post inspired by a Tweet from @Stephen_Curry:
Hivemind: got a favourite #popsci book that comes in at no more than 200-250 pages? Pls RT—
Stephen Curry (@Stephen_Curry) January 07, 2013
Basically, I’m stealing the idea. Thanks Stephen! Here is his Storify of the responses to his Tweet.
I’d like to compile a list of recommended Popular Science books. Books that you think everyone needs to read. Books that you would recommend to people that would not normally read a science book. Books that you would recommend to someone who is already knowledgeable about, say, physics, but knows very little about about, say, human evolution.
Let’s face it, there are a lot of Popular Science books out there – and some are a lot more accessible than others. I remember reading Brian Cox’s Why Does E=mc2?: (and Why Should We Care?), loving the first few chapters, but then struggling after that. I’d decided that I’d have to come back and re-read it after I’ve done some more of my physics degree! A friend at work read it as her first ever physics book and gave up. I responded with a Marcus Chown book she should read instead – and she loved it.
So, I’m after books for situations like this. Books you can recommend to people possibly as their first ever read in a particular area of science. Perhaps someone at work tells you that they loved the latest Wonders episode – you can respond with a book recommendation.
Requirements
- Like Stephen’s suggestion, not too many pages – but it can be longer than his requested 200-250 pages. Just remember that recommending a 500-600+ page to someone may just put them off!
- Accessible to someone who hasn’t studied the subject before.
- You can recommend as many books as you want, but I really want to see your favourite books. I want you to really think carefully about you book: “would I recommend this book to someone who knows nothing (or very little) about <insert subject area here>?”
- Stephen also suggested that the book should be relatively cheap and readily available.
My recommendations
I’ll start off with:
- Your Inner Fish - by Neil Shubin (256 pages). “The amazing discovery of our 375-million-year-old ancestor”. At times it reads like a thriller. I’ve read it twice – not because it was hard to understand, but because it was so good.
- The Code Book - by Simon Singh (402 pages). The history of code breaking from Ancient Egypt to the modern day. A wonderful, fascinating book.
- Quantum Theory Cannot Hurt You - by Marcus Chown (224 pages). Everything explained brilliantly, and full of “wow” moments.
- The Selfish Gene - by Richard Dawkins (384 pages). Whatever your feelings about him…he’s still a damn good writer!
- Supersense: From Superstition to Religion – The Brain Science of Belief – by Bruce Hood (320 pages). Another book full of “wow” moments, this time brain related.
- Mistakes Were Made (but Not by Me): Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions and Hurtful Acts – by Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson (304 pages). I think the title explains it all. A cracking read.
- Antimatter – by Frank Close (176 pages). A superb look at everything to do with these particles.
Please add a comment below with your book recommendations.
And feel free to recommend a book that has already been recommended - I’ll leave this blog post running for a while and then compile the comments down into an ordered list of books into another blog post. I’ll also take the book recommendations from Stephen’s Storify page.
UPDATE: Book recommendations via Tweets and Google+
I’ve had a few recommendations sent to me via Tweets and on the Google+ post for this blog. I thought I’d keep track of them here:
- Robin Ince: Six Easy Pieces: Fundamentals of Physics Explained - by Richard Feynman (176 pages).
- Robin Ince, Alun Salt: Life Ascending: The Ten Great Inventions of Evolution - by Nick Lane (352 pages).
- Robin Ince, David Steele: The Demon-haunted World - Carl Sagan (436 pages).
- Rob: Trilobite: Eyewitness to Evolution - by Richard Fortey (256 pages).
- Alun Salt: Last Chance to See - by Douglas Adams and Mark Cawardine (224 pages) [I agree, this is a fantastic book that I highly recommend. However, does it count as a Popular Science book? I mean, are science books supposed to make you laugh out loud?!]
- Martin Orman: Paranormality - by Richard Wiseman (336 pages).
- Mark Lewney: The Origin of Virtue - by Matt Ridley (302 pages).
- Doug Cairns: The Phenomenon of Man - by Pierre Theilhard de Chardin (319 pages).
- Mike Ward: How to Lie with Statistics - by Darrell Huff (128 pages).
- Mike Ward: The Ambidextrous Universe - by Martin Gardner (416 pages).
- Mike Ward: Afterglow of Creation: Decoding the message from the beginning of time - by Marcus Chown (288 pages).
- Mike Ward: We Need to Talk About Kelvin: What Everyday Things Tell Us About the Universe - by Marcus Chown (288 pages).
- John Tweedie: Dry Store Room No. 1: The Secret Life of the Natural History Museum - Richard Fortey (320 pages).
- Sam Hawkswell: Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth - by James Lovelock (176 pages).
- Ed Yong: Parasite Rex: Inside the Bizarre World of Nature’s Most Dangerous Creatures - by Carl Zimmer (288 pages).
- Ed Yong: The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks - by Rebecca Skloot (384 pages).
- Ed Yong: Superbug: The Fatal Menace of MRSA - by Maryn McKenna (288 pages).
- Ed Yong: Before the Lights Go Out: Conquering the Energy Crisis Before It Conquers Us - by Maggie Koerth-Baker (304 pages).
- Sam Hawkswell: The Planet in a Pebble: A Journey into Earth’s Deep History - by Jan Zalasiewicz (256 pages)
- Rob Sharp: Chaos: Making a New Science - by James Gleick (368 pages)
- Andrea Sella: Periodic Tales: The Curious Lives of the Elements - by Hugh Aldersey-Williams (448 pages).
- Andrea Sella: H2O: A Biography of Water - by Philip Ball (400 pages).
- Bob: Mutants: On the Form, Varieties and Errors of the Human Body – by Armand Marie Leroi (320 pages).



“Nonsense on Stilts” by Massimo Pigliucci (336 pages) is an excellent primer on philosophy of science. If you want to recommend a book explaining what makes science scientific, or the difference between “hard” and “soft” sciences, this is the one.
By: Drew Rae on January 29, 2013
at 08:43
My recommendation would be “Stiffs: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers” by Mary Roach.
Despite the ghoulish nature of the topic, this is a wonderful and hugely entertaining book. Ever wondered what happens when you leave your body to science?
By: colsmudge on January 29, 2013
at 08:57
A bit old now, but still excellent – and I found it online too. The left hand of the electron by Isaac Asimov.
http://www.arvindguptatoys.com/arvindgupta/asimov-electron.pdf
By: Julian Onions (@julianonions) on January 29, 2013
at 09:05
Wonderful Life – Stephen Jay Gould. One of the books that got me so interested in science.
By: sillypunk (@sillypunk) on January 29, 2013
at 09:08
Good call! So many of his books are great, but Wonderful Life is probably my favourite, especially because it’s right up my street. One of the most important lessons that I took away from reading that book:
http://endlessforms.net/2013/01/14/the-monday-quote-3/
By: Peter Harrison on January 29, 2013
at 19:23
“I have fiercely maintained one personal rule in all my so-called “popular” writing. (The word is admirable in its literal sense, but has been debased to mean simplified or adulterated for easy listening without effort in return.) I believe – as Galileo did when he wrote his two greatest works as dialogues in Italian rather than didactic treatises in Latin, as Thomas Henry Huxley did when he composed his masterful prose free from jargon, as Darwin did when he published all his books for general audiences – that we can still have a genre of scientific books suitable for and accessible alike to professionals and interested laypeople. The concepts of science, in all their richness and ambiguity, can be presented without any compromise, without any simplification counting as distortion, in language accessible to all intelligent people. Words, of course, must be varied, if only to eliminate a jargon and phraseology that would mystify anyone outside the priesthood, but conceptual depth should not vary at all between professional publication and general exposition.”
- Stephen Jay Gould, Wonderful Life, 1990, p.16.
By: Peter Harrison on January 29, 2013
at 19:24
“A very short introduction to the philosophy of science” By Samir Okasha. Because very few of use know much about why we conduct science the way we do.
By: Mark Lorch (@Sci_ents) on January 29, 2013
at 09:28
“Relativity: A very short introduction” (Russell Stannard)
This short, pocket-sized book covers both Special & General Relativity. I’ve read many books on these two related topics and this is the only one that has answered all my questions. Of course, you may have other questions I hadn’t thought of, but I went away satisfied. (Contains some maths, but is simple.)
By: henstridgesj on January 29, 2013
at 11:31
Damn, I was going to suggest Your Inner Fish! Great title. Short, informative, and easily digestible by anyone genuinely interested in learning about us highly-modified fish. Just remember who introduced it to you
By: Peter Harrison on January 29, 2013
at 19:18
By: Kash Farooq on January 29, 2013
at 19:21
I recommend Graham Farmelo’s book about Paul Dirac, ‘the Strangest Man’. It’s a very well written biography, and gives a great insight into the thinking and the interactions between pioneering minds at the beginnings of quantum mechanics.
By: John on January 30, 2013
at 06:54
Feynman’s “QED (the strange theory of light and matter)” is excellent. http://www.waterstones.com/waterstonesweb/products/richard+p-+feynman/q-e-d-/4229275/ I particularly like the way you come away from it actually able to *do* simple calculations in quantum electrodynamics.
By: polypompholyx on January 30, 2013
at 12:13
As it happens, I have just such a list (admittedly not my own) right here: http://alexanderbrown.info/2012/09/10/religion-explained-by-pigeons though I don’t know how well any of them follow your guidelines (especially The Ancestor’s Tale, which is very long indeed)
By: Alex Brown on January 30, 2013
at 13:24
Thanks Alex.
“Guns, Germs & Steel” is excellent, and I highly recommend it. I read it years ago and things from the book still keep popping into my head now. But, it didn’t make the cut because it was too long for the requirements stated in the post above.
I haven’t read “The Fabric of the Cosmos”, but have read “The Elegant Universe” – which I enjoyed. However, it is probably not a book I’d recommend to someone as their first ever physics book!
By: Kash Farooq on January 30, 2013
at 13:41
The Philosophical Baby by Alison Gopnik, accessible who has not had contact with babies and says more about how we understand the world than any philosopher.
Mothers and Others by Sarah Blaffer Hrdy, longer than asked for who doesn’t want to be told that marmosets are the closest primate example of human parenting.
By: Eamon on March 8, 2013
at 11:41
Wonderful Life has been recommended by several of us, and will likely be one that we read sometime as part of the book club. I’d like to point out something incorrect in the book which says less about Gould and more about the age of the book. Early in the book, Gould states quite matter of fact that sponges are not real animals like us, but an independent invention of multicellularity by evolution. Sponges are definitely animals. Indeed, we evolved from sponges. Some of the sponges are more closely related to all of us non-sponge animals than some other sponges groups!
That’s the only disclaimer for a wonderful title (no pun intended). All lines of evidence suggest that sponges are animals like you and me.
By: Peter Harrison on March 10, 2013
at 19:54